Episode 10 – The Designer’s Perspective
Run time: 26:28

Location:
California

Synopsis:
With all the publicity and controversy in the mass media about intelligent design, Matt and Tiffany take it upon themselves to find out more.

But instead of the regular route, the two trailblazers bypass both theologian and scientist and go straight to the source, meeting with Paul Down, an art professor and industrial designer.

They ask him some difficult questions, such as whether or not there is a signature style that can be seen in an artist’s creation that defines this as his personal work of art.

As they look at various examples of design and try to get into the mind of the artist, the two realize their philosophical differences, and things begin to heat up.

 

IRREDUCIBLE COMPLEXITY — An argument put forth by biologist Michael Behe (“Darwin’s Black Box”) in support of Intelligent Design. To use Behe’s own definition, “ a single system which is composed of several well-matched interacting parts that contribute to the basic function, wherein the removal of any one of the parts causes the system to effectively cease functioning.” Arguing against the assumption of Darwin’s natural selection that only traits that help a species survive are passed to future generations, he wonders how complex systems developed their necessary components, since individually those components would not be advanteous for survival. Examples of irreducibly complex systems from Behe are blood clotting and the cilium.

INTELLIGENT DESIGN — The proposition that certain features of the universe and of living things are better explained as having originated by an intelligent designer rather than through unguided natural processes. The Seattle-based Discovery Institute has been active in promoting this as worthy of inclusion in science curricula in public schools. However, the science community has been aggressive and largely successful in stiffling attempts to challenge materialism, despite the public’s favoring such inclusiveness. The term is often shortened to “I. D.”

THERMODYNAMICS, SECOND LAW OF — In plain English, the movement of the universe towards disorder (even energy distribution). That means things have a tendency to break down, not to organize themselves (the ability to organize is a key requirement for evolution at all levels). Popular physicist Stephen Hawking described it using an example from “time:” you can see a coffee cup break, and indeed many are breaking around the world…but none are reforming.

View the Glossary

 

 


 
Home | About the Show | Episodes | The Cast | For Teachers | Contact Us | Glossary | Order Now