|

Location:
California
Synopsis:
With all the publicity and controversy in the mass media about intelligent
design, Matt and Tiffany take it upon themselves to find out more.
But instead
of the regular route, the two trailblazers bypass both theologian and scientist
and go straight to the source, meeting with Paul Down, an art professor
and industrial designer.
They ask him some difficult
questions, such as whether
or not there is a signature style that can be seen in an artist’s creation
that defines this as his personal work of art.
As they look at various examples
of design and try to get into the mind of the artist, the two realize
their philosophical differences, and things begin to
heat up.
 |
IRREDUCIBLE
COMPLEXITY — An argument put forth by biologist
Michael Behe (“Darwin’s Black Box”)
in support of Intelligent Design. To use Behe’s
own definition, “ a single system which is
composed of several well-matched interacting parts
that contribute to the basic function, wherein
the removal of any one of the parts causes the
system to effectively cease functioning.” Arguing
against the assumption of Darwin’s natural
selection that only traits that help a species
survive are passed to future generations, he wonders
how complex systems developed their necessary components,
since individually those components would not be
advanteous for survival. Examples of irreducibly
complex systems from Behe are blood clotting and
the cilium.

INTELLIGENT DESIGN — The proposition that
certain features of the universe and of living
things are better explained as having originated
by an intelligent designer rather than through
unguided natural processes. The Seattle-based
Discovery Institute has been active in promoting
this as worthy of inclusion in science curricula
in public schools. However, the science community
has been aggressive and largely successful in
stiffling attempts to challenge materialism,
despite the public’s favoring such inclusiveness.
The term is often shortened to “I. D.”

THERMODYNAMICS, SECOND LAW OF — In plain
English, the movement of the universe towards
disorder (even energy distribution). That means
things have a tendency to break down, not to
organize themselves (the ability to organize
is a key requirement for evolution at all levels).
Popular physicist Stephen Hawking described it
using an example from “time:” you
can see a coffee cup break, and indeed many are
breaking around the world…but none are
reforming.

View the Glossary
|
 |
|